Realistic AI phishing simulation exercises are essential for preparing teams to face these sophisticated lures. In this blog post, we will review 10 specific AI-driven phishing simulation scenarios, explain why each is effective, and share tips for crafting convincing simulations. We will also cover best simulation practices and cite real-world examples showing how training dramatically reduces risk.
In an era where “people have become the primary attack vector,” ongoing training is indispensable. AI enables attackers to generate personalized, context-aware emails in seconds. The scenarios below—from fake HR notices to deepfake CEO messages—mirror real attacks seen worldwide. By simulating these scenarios, you can reveal weak spots in your team’s cyber defenses and strengthen them before a breach occurs.
An email appears to originate from HR or a corporate leader (e.g., “From: Sarah Smith, HR Director”) announcing an urgent company policy or benefits update. The body is polished and contextually rich, featuring details like reference numbers or employee names.
It may contain an attachment or link labeled “Policy_Update.pdf” or “Employee Handbook 2025 – Review and Sign.” Because it is written with AI (like ChatGPT) and tailored to your company, it feels authentic—possessing the correct tone, spelling, and even company jargon.
Attackers using AI can create a convincing HR memo in seconds. Employees expect HR emails, and a policy update or benefits change sounds routine yet critical. Urgency (“Please review by the end of the day”) and references to past communications enhance its believability. A cybersecurity blog notes that scammers can quickly create “personalized, realistic, and well-written emails that can trick even cautious users.” In simulations, HR-themed phishing often yields high click rates because employees want to comply with company directives.
To build a realistic simulation:
The user receives an email purportedly from “IT Support” or the “Security Team” indicating an urgent security issue. For example, “Your account was accessed from an unknown location” or “Critical software update required.” The message might offer a link to “reset your password” or “scan your device.” The design mimics official IT alerts with a corporate logo and a convincing signature.
People fear security warnings and feel compelled to act quickly. A well-crafted security alert triggers immediate attention. AI makes it easy to create a perfect alert message with no mistakes. For instance, a sample phishing email (generated by ChatGPT) stated, “Password Reset Required for Your Account” and included a realistic explanation and link.
It contained no strange phrasing, illustrating how even generic IT alerts can be highly convincing with AI. Employees often learn to react to any “security alert” by clicking first and verifying later—exactly what attackers desire.
A high-level executive (CEO, CFO, or VP) sends a message. It might arrive as an email titled “URGENT: Wire Transfer Needed” or “Confidential: Executive Request.” The tone is authoritative, often marked “High Importance.”
In some simulations, the email contains a link or attachment (invoice, financial form) or an invitation to a private video call. Attackers might include a deepfaked voice or face (see “AI deepfake” below) in a Teams/Zoom invite for next-level realism.
Emails from the boss demand attention and action. They often bypass second thoughts—employees feel pressured to respond quickly without verifying. AI amplifies this by removing imperfections; attackers can make the language flawless and the persona spot-on.
Real-life incidents prove the danger: In early 2024, an AI deepfake of a company’s CFO in a Zoom call convinced an employee to transfer $25.6 million. The combination of an email and a follow-up “video call” made the worker believe he was speaking to executives. Simulation exercises using just email can still be very effective at mimicking such Business Email Compromise (BEC) tactics.
A LinkedIn invitation or direct message appears, seemingly from a colleague, recruiter, or manager (often using an official-sounding name and profile). The message says something like, “Hi [Name], we have a new project/team needing your input” or “Opportunity: New Role Matched for You.” It includes a link to view a document or complete a form. Alternatively, it could be a connection request that, once accepted, immediately sends a follow-up phishing link.
Social networks breed trust. Employees often let their guard down on LinkedIn, not expecting the same level of security scrutiny as with email. Attackers can scrape LinkedIn profiles and use those details to craft personalized messages. 40% of campaigns extend beyond email (Slack, Teams, social media).
LinkedIn scams are common: posting jobs or projects entices employees to click on what looks like legitimate HR or work-related content. A message from “HR” or a known department on LinkedIn catches people off guard.
Your simulation can underscore this point: even professional networks can deliver dangerous phishing. Remind trainees to verify unusual LinkedIn messages through other channels.
The user receives an email stating, “A document has been shared with you” or “You have been granted access to [File Name].” It claims to be from Google Drive, Microsoft SharePoint, Dropbox, or Box. The email shows a preview or icon of the file and a “View Document” button. Clicking it leads to a fake login page asking for credentials. This simulates a common “Google Docs scam” or a Dropbox share alert.
Cloud collaboration is ubiquitous, so these alerts seem routine. A Keepnet study notes that Google Docs share attacks are widespread—the email informs you a doc is shared, providing a link to a fake Google login page. Since many employees use cloud file-sharing daily, they often click through without suspicion.
Attackers favor these because a compromised corporate Google or Office 365 account can also be used to phish others within the company, amplifying the impact. Reports indicate that 80% of phishing campaigns aim to steal cloud credentials (Microsoft 365, Google Workspace), underscoring how lucrative these lures are.
A message or notification arrives through an internal chat platform (e.g., Microsoft Teams, Slack). It appears to be from a system or colleague. For example, “IT Support via Teams” states your password needs resetting and provides a link. Or a coworker sends a direct message (DM) with a link: “Check this urgent customer request PDF I just uploaded.” The medium shifts from email to internal chat.
People trust messages within work tools. They might think, “Oh, it’s on Slack, so it must be safe.” Yet attackers have increasingly used these channels. Research found that phishing campaigns now deliberately target channels like Slack and Teams, accounting for approximately 40% of attacks. Employees rushing through chats can overlook security cues they might notice in email.
Plus, if a colleague’s account is compromised, their message seems completely normal. AI tools can generate chat-style language that matches team jargon and even use emojis for authenticity.
A text message arrives on the employee’s phone, pretending to be from IT, HR, or a service provider.
Examples: “Your payroll is on hold; confirm identity here [short link]” or “Unusual login detected on your email; reset password [link].” It may mimic services like Office 365 or corporate login screens through links. Because people often receive SMS messages at any time, this can catch them off-guard during non-working hours.
People are even less guarded with texts. Mobile phishing (“smishing”) often has 30–40% higher click rates than email phishing. Attackers can tailor messages using personal information (names, roles) to make them credible. AI chatbots can quickly personalize texts as well. Since many employees use phones for two-factor authentication or communication, a sense of urgency in a text can spur immediate clicking. This channel is often less trained compared to email.
The employee receives a phone call. The voice on the other end sounds like a known executive, colleague, or IT support person. The caller might say, “Hi [Name], this is [Executive Name]. I need you to process an urgent payment/provide access details immediately.”
AI voice cloning technology can replicate someone’s voice with high accuracy from just a few seconds of audio. The call might sound slightly robotic, but often good enough to fool someone under pressure.
Hearing a familiar voice builds instant trust. It bypasses visual checks (like email sender verification). Voice phishing (“vishing”) preys on the immediacy of phone calls. The $25 million deepfake scam mentioned earlier involved AI-generated voices in a video call, proving the technology’s effectiveness. Even without video, a cloned voice asking for urgent action can be highly persuasive, especially if the caller claims to be in a meeting or traveling.
authority figure or IT support. Alternatively, use a standard text-to-speech voice for a generic alert. - Scripting: Prepare a short, urgent script. Example: “This is IT Security. We detected unusual activity on your account. Please provide your employee ID to verify.” - Callback Number: Provide a fake callback number (if using automated vishing) that leads to a training message. - Verification Training: Emphasize verifying unexpected calls through official channels (e.g., calling the known IT helpdesk number, not the number provided in the suspicious call).
The team receives an email posing as a known vendor (with a logo and familiar email address) or a business partner. The message states, “Invoice [#] Attached – Payment Due,” accompanied by an attachment or link. The invoice looks legitimate, possibly in PDF format or as an embedded image. The tone is professional and financial: “This invoice is overdue; please process payment today.”
Finance and accounts payable teams routinely handle invoices, so such an email appears normal. Attackers favor this approach (it’s classic BEC). Using AI, they can craft detailed invoices with correct formats and amounts.
Urgency again plays a pivotal role: Employees may act quickly to avoid a penalty if they see a large sum due. Real companies have lost millions to such scams (one infamous attack on Facebook/Google cost $100M). In training, simulating this demonstrates how an innocent PDF can be a trap.
The phishing email concerns a hot topic or trending event. Examples include a fake relief fund after a disaster (“Support [earthquake/vaccine] – donate here”), a spoofed news alert about a company glitch (“URGENT: Data breach affecting your login”), or a social engineering hook (“Mandatory sexual harassment training video – watch now”). Alternatively, it could be an imposter “survey” about company satisfaction or COVID measures.
Humans respond strongly to current news and social causes. Phishers exploit curiosity or empathy. AI can quickly produce a catchy headline and content referencing real events. For example, during COVID-19, many encountered phishing lures about vaccines and relief efforts. Framing the message as an “extensive company survey” or a charity request encourages employees to click to participate or learn more. Since these topics are emotional or novel, people often lower their guard (especially if the email appears to come from a known charity or news outlet).
By following these practices, your simulations become a powerful tool rather than a mere annoyance. As CISA advises, repeated training and alerting employees to phishing risks can turn security from a weakness into a strength.
A large hospital ran three internal phishing campaigns. They found personalization significantly increased clicks: 64% of staff ignored a generic phishing email, but only 38% ignored a customized one. In other words, tailored simulations caught more people. The takeaway: realistic scenarios expose hidden vulnerabilities and teach more effectively.
By focusing on its riskiest 1,000 employees, Qualcomm’s security team turned persistent phishing victims into top performers. Within nine months, this ‘Risky 1000’ group cut their phishing test failure rates by more than threefold and even began outperforming many peers. When the program was expanded company-wide, phishing failures dropped by as much as sixfold. This success earned Qualcomm a CSO50 Award in 2024, proving that with the right approach, even the weakest links can become a strong first line of defense.
According to an extensive benchmark study, any organization (across industries) can dramatically improve. After one year of monthly simulated phishing tests and regular training, companies saw an average 87% reduction in employees prone to falling for phish. This real-world statistic demonstrates that ongoing training works. The only question is whether you start now or later.
These examples confirm the value of phishing simulation exercises. Your security posture grows stronger when your team correctly flags or reports a simulated phish.
AI elevates phishing from simple scams to context-aware attacks that can bypass the best defenses. This means training is more critical than ever. By running the scenarios above—from fake HR memos to impersonated executives—you can expose risky habits in a controlled way and turn potential victims into vigilant defenders. Remember to keep simulations fresh, relevant, and backed by data.
As security experts note, humans remain the primary attack surface. The good news is that “a well-trained workforce can learn how to spot common phishing signs and prevent attacks.” Every simulation is a chance to reinforce those signs: inspect URLs, verify requests, and think before clicking.
Ongoing training saves companies millions by stopping attacks before they start. Equip your team now with AI phishing simulation exercises tailored to current threats. The more realistic and varied your drills, the more agile your human firewall becomes. You can trust StrongestLayer will never disappoint you in this war against cybercrime.
AI phishing simulation exercises are controlled mock phishing attacks crafted using AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) to mimic real-world phishing tactics. They help organizations train employees by exposing them to realistic scenarios—such as fake HR policy updates or executive impersonations—so they learn to recognize and respond safely.
AI-generated scenarios allow for highly personalized, context-aware emails that closely mirror actual threats. Traditional tests often rely on generic templates, whereas AI can incorporate company-specific details, current events, and employee names—making the simulations more convincing and the training more effective.
The best practice is to run simulations at least quarterly, with a mix of scenario types each time. Organizations that conduct monthly exercises see the fastest improvement in employee resilience, but even quarterly tests help maintain awareness and adapt to evolving phishing tactics.
Provide immediate, non-punitive feedback. Show the employee the red flags they missed (e.g., mismatched URLs, unexpected senders) and direct them to a short learning module on spotting those cues. This real-time reinforcement is more effective than delayed training.
Key metrics include:
Tracking these metrics shows trends, highlights progress, and identifies groups needing additional training.
Yes. AI makes it easy to tailor scenarios by department or role. For example, HR-themed policy updates for general staff, CFO-impersonation scenarios for finance teams, and developer-targeted code-review phishing for engineering. Customization increases realism and training impact.
While AI tools like ChatGPT can generate email content, many organizations use dedicated security-awareness platforms (e.g., KnowBe4, Keepnet) that integrate AI, manage campaigns, track metrics, and automate feedback. Choose a platform that supports scenario customization and reporting.
Yes. Always inform employees that phishing simulations will occur (without disclosing exact timing), ensure data privacy, and avoid overly deceptive content (e.g., mock sensitive personal or health information). Obtain any required consent or approvals, and position the exercises as supportive training, not punitive testing.
Be the first to get exclusive offers and the latest news
Tomorrow's Threats. Stopped Today.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
Unordered list
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript
Be the first to get exclusive offers and the latest news
Tomorrow's Threats. Stopped Today.